Need To Know How Much Your Case is Worth? Call: (360) 980-1105

Initial Consultation Is Free Without any Obligation

Jim Sellers, Attorney At Law

40+ Years of experience in Personal Injury Law in both Washington and Oregon

Repaying your insurance company after settlement

Personal injury insurance settlement When your claim against a party who is at fault for your injuries is settled or otherwise resolved, your own insurance companies are often entitled to be repaid.  The insurance company for the at-fault party (the person who caused the injury) is primarily liable.  Your PIP coverage and health insurers are secondarily liable.  Secondarily liable insurance carriers who have paid treatment or wage loss are usually entitled to be repaid when a settlement is had with the primarily liable insurance carrier for the at-fault party.  Auto policies usually create the right to repayment.  If not, there is an equitable doctrine in the law that is called subrogation, which requires repayment under most circumstances.

accident attorney settlement insurance claimThe law on repayment or subrogation differs at least a little from State to State.  In Washington, there is no right to repayment unless the injured party is “made whole” by the settlement with the at-fault party.  If the injured person negotiates a settlement, the injured person is generally made whole in the eyes of the law.  However, if the only insurance proceeds that are available are the limits of the at-fault party’s insurance policy, the injured party is generally not considered made-whole with the receipt of the at-fault’s policy limits.  In those instances, a secondarily liable insurance carrier is not entitled to subrogation or repayment.

personal injury lawyer settlement insurance claimOn the other hand, in automobile cases in Oregon the secondarily liable carrier is ordinarily entitled to elect whether to seek direct repayment from the primarily liable carrier or to assert a lien against the injured party’s settlement, and be paid from the injured person’s settlement proceeds.

accident lawyer negotiation settlement with insurance company on settlementWhat is really the difference between Washington and Oregon on this?  In Washington, the secondarily liable carrier only had a lien and cannot directly negotiate with the primarily liable carrier if the injured person is seeking to recover directly from the at-fault party.  Furthermore, the secondarily liable carrier must contribute to the injured person’s attorneys fees and costs to obtain a settlement or jury verdict from the at-fault party.

In Oregon, if the secondarily liable carrier seeks direct repayment, there is no obligation to contribute to the injured person’s attorneys fees and costs.  However, if the secondary carrier elects to collect under a lien on the injured person’s Oregon claim, then the secondary carrier must contribute pro rata to the injured person’s attorneys fees, similar to the situation in the State of Washington.

Oregon accident attorney insurance claims settlementOregon’s system confers an advantage on secondarily liable insurance companies if they seek to collect reimbursement directly from the at-fault party’s insurer.  Generally, the primarily liable company that insures the at-fault party will not pay the full amount owed to the secondarily liable carrier until there is a settlement of the injured person’s claim against the at-fault party.  If the secondarily liable carriers can wait until that point they get repaid in full with no contribution to the injured person’s attorneys fees and costs.  In other words they get a free ride. If they try and get repayment sooner, they may have to take a discounted amount. 

auto accident settlement claim attorney The disadvantage to the injured person is that if the secondarily liable carrier gets direct payment, the injured person may not be made whole if there are limited insurance proceeds.  For instance, if there is a $25,000 insurance policy on the at-fault party, and the injured party’s treatment cost $20,000, in Oregon the injured party would get $5,000 minus attorneys fees and costs although the injured party’s damages are likely worth far more money.  In Washington under these same circumstances, the secondarily liable carrier would probably not be entitled to any repayment from the $25,000 because the injured party would not otherwise have been made whole.

>> Part 2 of 2 - Repaying Your Insurance Company After Settlement

 

Experienced accident attorney protecting your rights

If you or one of your loveds one have been injured in an accident and you believe that someone else is responsible for causing the accident and you are worried and confused about all the legal ramifications, medical expenses, litigation, protecting your rights and dealing with insurance companies and their adjusters, contact us for all your questions and concerns. We can discuss your case on the telephone without any obligation, without any fee. So contact us to get the answers to your questions and feel that you have begun to protect your rights. This call will not cost you anything except a little bit of your time. Call us today for your free consultation.